The Strength of Schedule table presents the winning percentages for each team and three different grouping of its conference opponents. These groupings include all opponents, opponents of games played, and opponents of unplayed games. Use this table to quantify whether a team's good record is due to strong play or weak opponents and assess future opponents strength. Note that the opponents record will not include games against the team under consideration (unbiased estimate). Click on a column heading to change sort criterion.
| Winning Percentage | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sort and Rank by Remaining Games | Rank | ||||
| Team | Self | Opponents of All Games Opp. of All Games |
Opponents of Played Games Opp. of Played Games |
>Opponents of >Remaining Games >Opp. of Remain Games |
Conf |
| Lamar | 75% | 51% | 48% | 63% | 1 |
| Texas A&M C.C. | 63% | 52% | 50% | 62% | 2 |
| McNeese | 94% | 50% | 48% | 58% | 3 |
| Stephen F. Austin | 44% | 51% | 49% | 58% | 4 |
| UT-Rio Grande Valley | 38% | 52% | 51% | 58% | 5 |
| Nicholls St. | 63% | 50% | 49% | 55% | 6 |
| Incarnate Word | 38% | 47% | 48% | 43% | 7 |
| Northwestern St.NWestrn St | 50% | 50% | 52% | 43% | 8 |
| Houston Christian | 50% | 47% | 48% | 43% | 9 |
| SE Louisiana | 69% | 49% | 51% | 40% | 10 |
| Texas A&M-CommerceTX A&M-Comm | 6% | 51% | 54% | 38% | 11 |
| New Orleans | 13% | 49% | 52% | 37% | 12 |